Just keep repeating: “C# is not Java. C# is not C++.”

Vicente Cartas’s latest blog post on Singleton’s in C# (original post in Spanish) illustrates something very important for learning C# well – there are subtle, but very important differences in C# which are very valuable to learn if you’re coming from a Java or C++ background.  This is a classic example – the traditional C++ forms of the Singleton pattern are not appropriate in C#.

C# and .NET make life a lot easier, in a lot of ways… but it’s critical to understand the subtle nuances caused by the abstraction layers .NET provides. 

This pops its head up in many places – one example is in the classic design patterns.  C# offers some great alternatives, with surprising consequences, to some of the classic forms of design patterns.  A nice example is the Visitor Pattern.  Judith Bishop and R. Nigel Horspool wrote a paper illustrating some interesting alternative implementations of the visitor pattern using C# 3.0.  I particularly like her delegate implementation.  The Observer Pattern is another great example – in C++, this pattern required quite a bit of implementation work.  In C#, the observer pattern is a core part of the language itself, down to having language keywords to describe it: event and delegate.

Memory management is another place C# dramatically differs from C++.  Many people tout the garbage collector and not having to free memory as a great advantage of C#, and it is, but that isn’t the only place where memory management changes the rules.  The specific implementation of the garbage collector alters memory allocation, for example.  In C++, constructing a new object on the heap is a fairly expensive operation.  If you’re making performant code, you need to do everything you can to keep all memory allocations on the stack in your loops, or you’ll dramatically impact your runtime speed. 

In C#, the rules completely change.  Memory allocations in C# are (relatively) cheap – no longer do you need to worry (as much) about allocating objects in the middle of loops.  This changes the way you can approach an algorithm, and can have a huge impact on the resulting code.

I guess my main comment is: If you’re planning to really delve into C#, treat it like a separate language from what you’ve learned before.  Read a good book that really discusses the core aspects that sets C# and .NET apart, such as C# in Depth or CLR via C#.

About Reed
Reed Copsey, Jr. - http://www.reedcopsey.com - http://twitter.com/ReedCopsey


6 Responses to “Just keep repeating: “C# is not Java. C# is not C++.””
  1. Vicente says:

    Nice examples, and great title 🙂

  2. JaneRadriges says:

    Hi, gr8 post thanks for posting. Information is useful!

    [WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us ‘0 which is not a hashcash value.

  3. I really like your post. Does it copyright protected?

    [WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The poster sent us ‘0 which is not a hashcash value.

  4. Reed says:

    @KattyBlackyard: Like all text in the US, this is copyright protected, but you are free to quote this article in any text or on any site.

    @Cade Roux: That’s an interesting implementation. It shows the same basic principals – C# lets you do some great things if you learn it.


Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. […] Reed Copsey ha publicado un artículo sobre este mismo tema llamado "Just keep repeating: C# is not Java. C# is not C++" que contiene más ejemplos y resulta bastante interesante. Published Wednesday, May 20, 2009 5:21 […]

    [WORDPRESS HASHCASH] The comment’s server IP ( doesn’t match the comment’s URL host IP ( and so is spam.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!