<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parallelism in .NET &#8211; Part 1, Decomposition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on C#, WPF, .NET, and programming for Scientific Visualization</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 16:07:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel Eyes</title>
		<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-1875</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel Eyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 07:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-1875</guid>
		<description>Thanks, that was very clear and concise. I&#039;m going to read on about the tasks, and all the way to csharp 5.0 and async</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, that was very clear and concise. I&#8217;m going to read on about the tasks, and all the way to csharp 5.0 and async</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirley</title>
		<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-1796</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 04:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-1796</guid>
		<description>Superior thinking demontsrated above. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superior thinking demontsrated above. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tariq Azam</title>
		<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-1669</link>
		<dc:creator>Tariq Azam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-1669</guid>
		<description>I wish i would have discovered it earlier. Great work Reed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish i would have discovered it earlier. Great work Reed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-931</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-931</guid>
		<description>Cyril,

Although I love VS 2010 RC and .NET 4, you can use this in .NET 3.5sp1.  It requires installing the Rx Framework, available at:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/devlabs/ee794896.aspx

The Rx Framework includes a backport of nearly all of the Task Parallel Library and PLINQ.  (The differences are mainly differences in the ThreadPool - the backport uses .NET 3.5&#039;s ThreadPool, which is not as feature-rich as .NET 4&#039;s ThreadPool.)

-Reed
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyril,</p>
<p>Although I love VS 2010 RC and .NET 4, you can use this in .NET 3.5sp1.  It requires installing the Rx Framework, available at:</p>
<p><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/devlabs/ee794896.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/devlabs/ee794896.aspx</a></p>
<p>The Rx Framework includes a backport of nearly all of the Task Parallel Library and PLINQ.  (The differences are mainly differences in the ThreadPool &#8211; the backport uses .NET 3.5&#8242;s ThreadPool, which is not as feature-rich as .NET 4&#8242;s ThreadPool.)</p>
<p>-Reed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyril Gupta</title>
		<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyril Gupta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-924</guid>
		<description>Excellent series Reed! I wanted to use the Task Parallel library in my latest project but when I tried to look for it (in .Net framework 3.5) there wasn&#039;t any task class in the Threading namespace.

I thought you said it had been back-included in 3.5 sp1?

I am now changing over to .Net 4.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent series Reed! I wanted to use the Task Parallel library in my latest project but when I tried to look for it (in .Net framework 3.5) there wasn&#8217;t any task class in the Threading namespace.</p>
<p>I thought you said it had been back-included in 3.5 sp1?</p>
<p>I am now changing over to .Net 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parallelism in .NET &#8211; Part 12, More on Task Decomposition : Reed Copsey, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Parallelism in .NET &#8211; Part 12, More on Task Decomposition : Reed Copsey, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-832</guid>
		<description>[...] tasks can be decomposed using a Data Decomposition approach, but often, this is not appropriate.&#160; Frequently, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tasks can be decomposed using a Data Decomposition approach, but often, this is not appropriate.&#160; Frequently, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachin</title>
		<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-817</guid>
		<description>Great article. I was looking for good and simple artilce on PLINQ and you really made a simple and effective article... Its going to be interesting to read this series.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I was looking for good and simple artilce on PLINQ and you really made a simple and effective article&#8230; Its going to be interesting to read this series.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parallelism in .NET &#8211; Part 6, Declarative Data Parallelism : Reed Copsey, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-610</link>
		<dc:creator>Parallelism in .NET &#8211; Part 6, Declarative Data Parallelism : Reed Copsey, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 01:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-610</guid>
		<description>[...] working with a problem that can be decomposed by data, we have a collection, and some operation being performed upon the collection.&#160; I’ve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] working with a problem that can be decomposed by data, we have a collection, and some operation being performed upon the collection.&#160; I’ve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parallelism in .NET &#8211; Part 2, Simple Imperative Data Parallelism : Reed Copsey, Jr.</title>
		<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>Parallelism in .NET &#8211; Part 2, Simple Imperative Data Parallelism : Reed Copsey, Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 01:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-554</guid>
		<description>[...] my discussion of Decomposition of the problem space, I mentioned that Data Decomposition is often the simplest abstraction to use [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my discussion of Decomposition of the problem space, I mentioned that Data Decomposition is often the simplest abstraction to use [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reed</title>
		<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>Caspar,

Glad to hear it!  I&#039;m actually having a lot of fun with this - I&#039;ve been wanting to write about parallelism in depth for a while... I hope the series continues to be useful for you.

-Reed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caspar,</p>
<p>Glad to hear it!  I&#8217;m actually having a lot of fun with this &#8211; I&#8217;ve been wanting to write about parallelism in depth for a while&#8230; I hope the series continues to be useful for you.</p>
<p>-Reed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caspar Kleijne</title>
		<link>http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>Caspar Kleijne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reedcopsey.com/2010/01/19/parallelism-in-net-part-1-decomposition/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Great article,

made absolute sense to me! I&#039;ve got a feeling this is leading to a very interesting refreshing way of thinking and programming. (at least for me)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article,</p>
<p>made absolute sense to me! I&#8217;ve got a feeling this is leading to a very interesting refreshing way of thinking and programming. (at least for me)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
 
